What is Template Pattern?
Template pattern, an abstract class exposes a ways to execute its methods. The subclasses can override the method implementation as per need but the invocation is to be in the same way as defined by an abstract class

When to use Template Pattern?

  1. When behaviour of an algorithm can vary, you let subclasses implement the behaviour through overriding
  2. You want to avoid code duplication, implementing variations of the algorithm in subclasses
  3. You want to control the point that subclassing is allowed.

What is BeanFactory?
The BeanFactory is the actual container which instantiates, configures, and manages a number of beans.Let have a look at how spring works

How it Works

  1. When the application is Deployed the Spring framework reads the xml file and creates the objects.Those are the objects which you see in the Spring Container
  2. Now when you try to refer any of these objects from the outside object using the new method it will throw an exception since or when you try to create a object using new method, the spring container has no idea about the object which you are trying to access
  3. Now to access the object in the container you will use the BeanFactory Objects

BeanFactory is represented by org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanFactory interface.It is the main and the basic way to access the Spring container.Other ways to access the spring container such as ApplicationContext,ListableBeanFactory, ConfigurableBeanFactory etc. are built upon this BeanFactory interface.

BeanFactory interface defines basic functionality for the Spring Container like

  1. It is built upon Factory Design Pattern
  2. provides DI / IOC mechanism for the Spring.
  3. It loads the beans definitions and their property descriptions from some configuration source (for example, from XML configuration file) .
  4. Instantiates the beans when they are requested like beanfactory_obj.getBean(“beanId”).
  5. Wire dependencies and properties for the beans according to their configuration defined in configuration source while instantiating the beans.
  6. Manage the bean life cycle by bean lifecycle interfaces and calling initialization and destruction methods.

Note that BeanFactory does not create the objects of beans immediately when it loads the configuration for beans from configuration source.Only bean definitions and their property descriptions are loaded. Beans themselves are instantiated and their properties are set only when they are requested such as by getBean() method.

Different BeanFactory Implementations:

XmlBeanFactory using Constructor:

Resource res = new FileSystemResource("c:/beansconfig.xml");
BeanFactory bfObj = new XmlBeanFactory(res);
MyBean beanObj= (MyBean) bfObj.getBean("mybean");
  1. The XmlBeanFactory takes the resource object as Parameter
  2. bfObj points to the Spring Container from which you try to fetch the object
  3. mybean is the ID of the Object specified in the XML File
  4. In the above case BeanFactory loads the beans lazily.BeanFactory will read bean definition of a bean with id “mybean” from beansconfig.xml file, instantiates it and return a reference to that.
  5. There are tow implementation of Resource Intefrace. one is org.springframework.core.io.FileSystemResource as seen above and other is org.springframework.core.io.ClassPathResource which loads Loads the resource from classpath(shown below).
ClassPathResource resorce = new ClassPathResource ("beansconfig.xml");
BeanFactory factory = new XmlBeanFactory(resource);

ClassPathXmlApplicationContext:

ClassPathXmlApplicationContext appContext = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(
        new String[] {"applicationContext.xml", "applicationContext-part2.xml"});

//an ApplicationContext is also a BeanFactory.
BeanFactory factory = (BeanFactory) appContext;

null

Note BeanFactory is not recomended for use in latest Spring versions. It is there only for backward compatability. ApplicationContext is preferred over this because ApplicationContext provides more advance level features which makes an application enterprise level application.

This is caused by setting something too large on a 32-bit HotSpot vm, for example:If you have running the x86 JVM instead of the 64 bit you may end up with this issue

While running Maven Sure fire plugin you may endup with this problem mostly when you are using 32 bit version of Java

org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-surefire-plugin
2.7.2

-Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
 set "JAVA_OPTS=-Xms512m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m


The MaxPermSize allowed is 512m, but it still throws error when you try to run a build setting to max of 512m.

Set MaxPermSize less than 500m

Solution

 set "JAVA_OPTS=-Xms512m -Xmx400m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m

This may also happen if maven is not using the right JVM if more that one JVM is installed in the system or set MAVEN_OPTS = -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m

Autowiring vs new Object Keyword

Autowiring new Object()
decouples object creation and life-cycle from object binding and usage Using new Keyword creates new Object everytime.The object graph grows over a period of time.Consider UserDaoImpl perhaps needs a Hibernate session, which needs a DataSource, which needs a JDBC connection – it quickly becomes a lot of objects that has to be created and initialized over and over again. When you rely on new in your code
Autowiring offers object at different scopes – Singleton, request and prototype All objects are JVM Scope

How Autowiring works
The autowiring happens when the application starts up, during the time of deployment.When it sees @Autowired, Spring will look for a class that matches the property in the applicationContext, and inject it automatically.

Lets see a example where the dependencies are resolved by XML and annotation
ApplicationContext.xml

<beans ...>
    <bean id="userService" class="com.foo.UserServiceImpl"/>
    <bean id="fooController" class="com.foo.FooController"/>
</beans>

When it sees @Autowired, Spring will look for a class that matches the property in the applicationContext, and inject it automatically. If you have more than 1 UserService bean, then you’ll have to qualify which one it should use.

FooController.java

public class FooController 
{
    // You could also annotate the setUserService method instead of this
    @Autowired
    private UserService userService;

    // rest of class goes here
}

Things to Note while Autowiring

  1. Marks a constructor, field, setter method or config method as to be autowired by Spring’s dependency injection facilities.
  2. Only one constructor (at max) of any given bean class may carry this annotation, indicating the constructor to autowire when used as a Spring bean. Such a constructor does not have to be public.
  3. Fields are injected right after construction of a bean, before any config methods are invoked. Such a config field does not have to be public.
  4. •In the case of multiple argument methods, the ‘required’ parameter is applicable for all arguments.

Annotation or XML
For instance, if using Spring, it is entirely intuitive to use XML for the dependency injection portion of your application. This gets the code’s dependencies away from the code which will be using it, by contrast, using some sort of annotation in the code that needs the dependencies makes the code aware of this automatic configuration.

However, instead of using XML for transactional management, marking a method as transactional with an annotation makes perfect sense, since this is information a programmer would probably wish to know. But that an interface is going to be injected as a SubtypeY instead of a SubtypeX should not be included in the class, because if now you wish to inject SubtypeX, you have to change your code, whereas you had an interface contract before anyways, so with XML, you would just need to change the XML mappings and it is fairly quick and painless to do so.

I haven’t used JPA annotations, so I don’t know how good they are, but I would argue that leaving the mapping of beans to the database in XML is also good, as the object shouldn’t care where its information came from.If an annotation provides functionality and acts as a comment in and of itself, and doesn’t tie the code down to some specific process in order to function normally without this annotation, then go for annotations. For example, a transactional method marked as being transactional does not kill its operating logic, and serves as a good code-level comment as well. Otherwise, this information is probably best expressed as XML, because although it will eventually affect how the code operates, it won’t change the main functionality of the code, and hence doesn’t belong in the source files.

How auto wiring works in Spring

  1. All Spring beans are managed – they “live” inside a container, called “application context”.the application context is bootstrapped and all beans – autowired. In web applications this can be a startup listener.
  2. All application has an entry point to that context. Web applications have a Servlet, JSF uses a el-resolver
  3. the context instantiates the objects, not you. I.e. – you never make new UserServiceImpl() – the container finds each injection point and sets an instance there.
  4. applicationContext.xml you should enable the so that classes are scanned for the @Controller, @Service, etc. annotations.
  5. Apart from the @Autowired annotation, Spring can use XML-configurable autowiring. In that case all fields that have a name or type that matches with an existing bean automatically get a bean injected. In fact, that was the initial idea of autowiring – to have fields injected with dependencies without any configuration. Other annotations like @Inject, @Resource can also be used

Problem
When using getResultList() to retrieve the Rows of the DB table there may be times where you would end up getting the same rows multiple times.

Why this Happens
Let’s have a table tblGroup the one below

ParentGrp GrpName
Finance Accounts
Finance Sales
  1. You have 2 records in database.Both the records has Finance as value in parentGrp column
  2. Now when you run a select query to select parentGrp = ‘Finance’ you will get 2 records
  3. Lets query them WHERE parentGrp = ‘Finance’
  4. SQL Query returns 2 rows
  5. Hibernate loads first one, and puts into session, with parentGrp as a key.Now this will happen if you have specified it as @ID in entity class or you havent specified it while joining two tables in entity class.The object is placed into the result list.
  6. Hibernate loads second one, notices that an object with the same @Id is already in the session, and just places the reference into the result List. Row data are ignored.
  7. Now we have two copies of the same record

Solution:
We can solve this by introducing a primary key column something like tblGroup_pk_id.Now this helps to uniquely identify the records in the table so it won’t get overridden when the next rows retrieved.

Now the GrpId should be entitled with @ID annotation in the entity class.

GrpId ParentGrp GrpName
101 Finance Accounts
102 Finance Sales
createQuery() createSQLQuery() createCriteria()
Creates Query Object Creates Query Object Creates Criteria Object
Uses HQL Syntax Uses DB Specific Syntax Uses Entity Class
The Columns of the rows retrieved would be name of the POJO Model Class The Columns of the rows retrieved would be name of Native DB fields Create sql query using Criteria object for setting the query parameters
CRUD operation could be done CRUD operation could be done Only Read Operation is allowed
Supports Interoperability between different DB’s Does not support Interoperability since the query format should be changed when the DB is changed Supports Interoperability between different DB’s
Does not work without Model Class Bean with columns of Table alone is Enough.No need for Entity class generation Does not work without Model Class
No need for mapping between Entity class object and Table Columns The Bean Objects should be mapped with table Columns No need for mapping

createQuery – session.createQuery()

------------------------------------------------------
**DB_TBL_Col(tblEmployee)**| **POJO(Employee)**
EMP_ID                     | employeeID
------------------------------------------------------
Query query = session.createQuery("from Employee E where E.employeeID = 'A%'");
List<Person> persons = query.list();

parent-pom.xml

<dependencyManagement>
  <dependencies>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>junit</groupId>
      <artifactId>junit</artifactId>
      <version>3.8</version>
    </dependency>
 </dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>

child-pom.xml

<dependencies>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>junit</groupId>
      <artifactId>junit</artifactId>
    </dependency>
 </dependencies>

Two Main Differeneces

  1. Dependency Management allows to consolidate and centralize the management of dependency versions without adding dependencies which are inherited by all children. This is especially useful when you have a set of projects (i.e. more than one) that inherits a common parent.Another extremely important use case of dependencyManagement is the control of versions of artifacts used in transitive dependencies.You still need to define them in the child POM to show that you are using them. They are not actually included in the child projects just because they are in in the parent POM. Enclosing dependencies in centralizes management of the version, scope, and exclusions for each dependency, if and when you decide to use it.
  2. Artifacts specified in the section <dependencies> will ALWAYS be included as a dependency of the child module(s).Artifacts specified in the section will only be included in the child module if they were also specified in the section of the child module itself. Why is it good you ask? because you specify the version and/or scope in the parent, and you can leave them out when specifying the dependencies in the child POM. This can help you use unified versions for dependencies for child modules, without specifying the version in each child module.

To sum up the above points in simple words in the parent-pom.xml if you are adding things inside tag then it would be available to the child-pom.xml. If you are adding the same thing within tag then you should manually add them to the child-pom.xml.In the child-pom.xml if the version is not specified it will take the parent-pom.xml version of the dependency as default else you can override them by specifying one in child-pom.xml

References Read It

BuildDeploy.bat

 cscript /nologo c:\Utils\stopjboss.vbs

 set JBOSS_DEPLOYMENT=c:\jboss\standalone\deployments
 set DEVELOPMENT_HOME=c:\projectName
 set BRANCH=BranchName\ReleaseNo
 
 del /q %JBOSS_DEPLOYMENT%\*.*
 cd %DEVELOPMENT_HOME%\%BRANCH%
 
 call mvn clean
 call mvn install -o
 
 IF EXISTS  %DEVELOPMENT_HOME%\%BRANCH%\SpringMVC.war (
  goto :startServer
 ) else (
  echo Build Failed
 )

 exit /b

:startServer
 copy %DEVELOPMENT_HOME%\%BRANCH%\SpringMVC.war %JBOSS_DEPLOYMENT%
 cscript /nologo c:\Utils\startjboss.vbs
goto :eof

startjboss.vbs

 Set WshShell = WScript.CreateObject("WScript.Shell")
 activateServer("Server")
 WshShell.SendKeys "%{d}"

 Function activateServer(windowName)
   WshShell.SendKeys "^{3}"
   WScript.Sleep 500
   WshShell.SendKeys windowName
   WScript.Sleep 500
   WshShell.SendKeys "{ENTER}"
 End Function

stopjboss.vbs

 Set WshShell = WScript.CreateObject("WScript.Shell")
 activateServer("Server")
 WshShell.SendKeys "%{s}"
 WScript.Sleep 5000

How it Works

  • We are using a VBScript to Start and Stop server by Sending Key Strokes to Eclipse(Shortcut Keys)
  • The mvn clean and mvn install is done in 2 different steps to make sure that clean of the war files happen before the new file is created since executing clean and install in single shot happened to give inconsistent results
  • Once the build is done we are checking whether the war file is created or we are assuming the build failed and we are not starting the server
  • The builddeploy.bat should be configured in External Tools Configuration
  • Workdirectory is the one which has pom.xml of the project
  • Assign a shortcut key to Run Last Run Build Configuration