When Singleton should be used?
Singleton should be used incase creation of Object is costly or heavy I.E. DBConnection. It should not be used if the Object is mutable.

  1. Eager initialization
  2. Lazy initialization
  3. Static block initialization
  4. Using Synchronized method
  5. Using Synchronized block
  6. Double Checked Locking
  7. Enum Singleton
  8. Initialization on demand holder idiom

3 Things are common across all singleton implementation

private constructor
public static getInstance Method
private static instance field

Eager initialization
An instance of Singleton Class is created at the time of class loading

EagerInitialized.java

package com.mugil.singleton;

public class EagerInitialized {
	
	private static final EagerInitialized instance = new EagerInitialized();
	
	//Private Constructor
	private EagerInitialized()
	{
	}
	
	public static EagerInitialized getInstance()
	{
         return instance;
        }	
}

Lazy Initialization
With lazy initialization you crate instance only when its needed and not when the class is loaded

LazyInitialized.java

package com.mugil.singleton;

public class LazyInitialized 
{
	public static  LazyInitialized instance = null; 
	
	private LazyInitialized()
	{
		
	}
	
	public static LazyInitialized getInstance(){
        if(instance == null){
            instance = new LazyInitialized();
        }
        return instance;
    }
}

Static Block Initialization
Static block initialization is similar to eager initialization, except that an instance of class is created in the static block that provides an option for exception handling.

StaticBlockInitialized.java

package com.mugil.singleton;

public class StaticBlockInitialized {

	private static StaticBlockInitialized instance;

	private StaticBlockInitialized() {
	}

	// Static block initialization for exception handling
	static {
		try {
			instance = new StaticBlockInitialized();
		} catch (Exception e) {
			throw new RuntimeException("Exception occurred in creating singleton instance");
		}
	}

	public static StaticBlockInitialized getInstance() {
		return instance;
	}
}

Using Synchronized Method
The easier way to create a thread-safe singleton class is to make the access method synchronized, so that only one thread can execute this method at a time.

ThreadSafeSing.java

package com.mugil.singleton;

public class ThreadSafeSing {

    private static ThreadSafeSinginstance;
    
    private ThreadSafeSing(){}
    
    public static synchronized ThreadSafeSing getInstance(){
        if(instance == null){
            instance = new ThreadSafeSing();
        }
        return instance;
    }    
}

Using Synchronized Block
The easier way to create a thread-safe singleton class is to make the access method synchronized, so that only one thread can execute this method at a time. Refer the link for the same Link

ThreadSafeSing.java

package com.mugil.singleton;

public class ThreadSafeSing {
    private static ThreadSafeSinginstance;
    
    private ThreadSafeSing(){}
    
    public static ThreadSafeSing getInstance(){
        Synchronized(ThreadSafeSing.class){ 
          if(instance == null){
            instance = new ThreadSafeSing();
          }
        }
        return instance;
    }    
}

Double Checked Locking Singleton
Above Implementation of Singleton provides thread safety buy has a hit over performance. The performance hit happens when two threads try to get the instance of object in getInstance() method but only one is allowed within Synchronized block while the other needs to wait until the first is done checking irrespective of the instance is already created or not.

In the Below method of Implementing Singleton, we again use Synchronized Block but we do the check for the availability of the object instance even before taking lock.

DCCSingleton.java

package com.mugil.singleton;

public class DCCSingleton{

    private static DCCSingletoninstance;
    
    private DCCSingleton(){}
    
   public static DCCSingleton getInstanceUsingDoubleLocking()
   {
    if(instance == null){
        synchronized (DCCSingleton.class) {
            if(instance == null){
                instance = new DCCSingleton();
            }
        }
    }
    return instance;
  }    
}

Refer the Link for how Double Checked Locking works

ENUM Singleton
enum fields are compile time constants, but they are instances of their enum type. And, they’re constructed when the enum type is referenced for the first time.
ENUMSingleton.java
Simple Singleton using enum for DBConnection

public enum EnumSingleton
{
    INSTANCE;

    // instance vars, constructor
    private final Connection connection;

    private Singleton()
    {
        //Initialize the connection
        connection = DB.getConnection();
    }

    public Connection getConnection(){
       return connection;
    }

    // Static getter
    public static Singleton getInstance()
    {
        return INSTANCE;
    }
}

The way it works we can either use getInstance() method or directly call EnumSingleton.INSTANCE to access connection Object.

The Connection can be created using the Below Code

  Connection Conn = Singleton.getInstance().getConnection();

Minimal Implementation using ENUM

public enum MySingleton {
  INSTANCE;   
}

In the above code we may get a doubt how the object is created as we have a empty private constructor which is never invoked?.

The above code gets converted as one below. Above code has an implicit empty constructor. Lets make it explicit instead,

public enum MySingleton {
    INSTANCE;
    private MySingleton() {
        System.out.println("Here");
    }
}

Now when we make a call as below the private constructor is invoked and object gets created

public static void main(String[] args) {
    System.out.println(MySingleton.INSTANCE);
}

Output

Here
INSTANCE

Initialization on demand holder idiom
How it works?

  1. The Below implementation is a lazy loading and thread safe method of creating Singleton
  2. On calling the getInstance() method the lazySingletonClass would be initialized which in turn makes the INSTANCE to be initialized.
  3. Class initialization is inherently thread-safe and if you can have an object initialized on class initialization the object creation too are thread-safe.
  4. Singleton instance variable will never be created and or initialized until getInstance() is invoked. And again since class initialization is thread-safe the instance variable of IntiailizationOnDemandClassholder will be loaded safely, once and is visible to all threads.
public class Singleton {
    private Singleton(){}

    public static class lazySingletonClass{
      private static final Singleton INSTANCE = new Singleton();
    }

    public Singleton getInstance(){
        return lazySingletonClass.INSTANCE;
    }
}
When Object is Created Thread Safe Performance Comments
Eager Initialization Object Gets Created once the Class is Loaded Yes Bad Object is created everytime when the class is accessed
Lazy Initialization Object is Created once required No In lazy initialization you give a public API to get the instance. In multi-threaded environment it poses challenges to avoid unnecessary object creation
Static Block Initialization Object is Created once Static Block is loaded Yes Bad Not a good idea to load resources from static block as it causes performance hit during app startup
Synchronized Method Object is Created once getInstance is called Yes Bad Thread safety is guaranteed.Slow performance because of whole method locking is done
Synchronized Block Object is Created once getInstance is called No Two singleton instances may be created when context switching happens after checking instance is null
Double Checked Locking Object is Created once getInstance is called Yes Good Instance check is done twice
Enum Implementation Object Created using enum is referenced Yes Good
Initialization on demand holder idiom Object Created when static class is initiazlied by calling getInstance method Yes Good Class initialization is inherently thread-safe and if you can have an object initialized on class initialization the object creation too are thread-safe

Note
Dont be confused between Class Loading and Initialization. In the Initialization on demand holder method of singleton you can easily get confused as the static inner class wont be loaded when the outer class loads. The implementation relies on the fact that during initialization phase of execution within the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) as specified by the Java Language Specification (JLS) When the class Singleton is loaded by the JVM, the class goes through initialization. Since the class does not have any static variables to initialize, the initialization completes trivially. The static class definition lazySingletonClasswithin it is not initialized until the JVM determines that lazySingletonClassmust be executed. The static class lazySingletonClassis only executed when the static method getInstance is invoked on the class

The static class lazySingletonClass is only executed when the static method getInstance is invoked on the class Singleton , and the first time this happens the JVM will load and initialize the lazySingletonClass class. The initialization of the lazySingletonClassclass results in static variable INSTANCE being initialized by executing the (private) constructor for the outer class Something. Since the class initialization phase is guaranteed by the JLS to be sequential, i.e., non-concurrent, no further synchronization is required in the static getInstance method during loading and initialization

Simple Singleton Using ENUM

MySingleton.java

public enum MySingleton {
  INSTANCE;   
}

Enum Classes has Private Constructor by Default

The Above code can be explicitly written as

MySingleton.java

public enum MySingleton {
    public final static MySingleton INSTANCE = new MySingleton();
    private MySingleton() {
    }
}

When your code first accesses INSTANCE, the class MySingleton will be loaded and initialized by the JVM. This process initializes the static field above once (lazily).

Why cant enum constructors be protected or public in Java?
Enums as a class with a finite number of instances. There can never be any different instances beside the ones you initially declare.Thus, you cannot have a public or protected constructor, because that would allow more instances to be created.

While Implementing Singleton the following things should be answered

  1. Reflection
  2. Serialization
  3. Cloning

Objects for Singleton Classes implemented using private Constructor can be invoked by Reflection as below

Item3.java

package com.mugil.org.ej;

import java.lang.reflect.Constructor;

public class Item3 {
	public static void main(String[] args) 
	{
		// reflection concept to get constructor of a Singleton class.  
		Constructor<Singleton> constructor;
		
		try {			
			constructor = Singleton.class.getDeclaredConstructor();
			
			// change the accessibility of constructor for outside a class object creation.
			constructor.setAccessible(true);
			
			// creates object of a class as constructor is accessible now.
			Singleton secondOb = constructor.newInstance();
			System.out.println(secondOb.getName());
			
			// close the accessibility of a constructor.
			constructor.setAccessible(false);
		} catch (Exception e){
			// TODO Auto-generated catch block
			e.printStackTrace();
		}		
	}
}


class Singleton {

    private static Singleton instance = new Singleton();

    /* private constructor */
    private Singleton() {}

    public static Singleton getDefaultInstance() {
        return instance;
    }
    
    public String getName()
    {
    	return "MyName";
    }
}

Output

MyName

Singleton and Serialization
Without readResolve() Method

// Java code to explain effect of 
// Serilization on singleton classes
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.FileOutputStream;
import java.io.ObjectInput;
import java.io.ObjectInputStream;
import java.io.ObjectOutput;
import java.io.ObjectOutputStream;
import java.io.Serializable;
 
class Singleton implements Serializable 
{
    // public instance initialized when loading the class
    public static Singleton instance = new Singleton();
     
    private Singleton() 
    {
        // private constructor
    }
}
 
 
public class GFG 
{
 
    public static void main(String[] args) 
    {
        try
        {
            Singleton instance1 = Singleton.instance;
            ObjectOutput out
                = new ObjectOutputStream(new FileOutputStream("file.text"));
            out.writeObject(instance1);
            out.close();
     
            // deserailize from file to object
            ObjectInput in 
                = new ObjectInputStream(new FileInputStream("file.text"));
             
            Singleton instance2 = (Singleton) in.readObject();
            in.close();
     
            System.out.println("instance1 hashCode:- "
                                                 + instance1.hashCode());
            System.out.println("instance2 hashCode:- "
                                                 + instance2.hashCode());
        } 
         
        catch (Exception e) 
        {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }
}

Output

instance1 hashCode:- 1550089733
instance2 hashCode:- 785945

With readResolve() Method

// Java code to remove the effect of 
// Serialization on singleton classes
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.FileOutputStream;
import java.io.ObjectInput;
import java.io.ObjectInputStream;
import java.io.ObjectOutput;
import java.io.ObjectOutputStream;
import java.io.Serializable;
 
class Singleton implements Serializable 
{
    // public instance initialized when loading the class
    public static Singleton instance = new Singleton();
     
    private Singleton() 
    {
        // private constructor
    }
     
    // implement readResolve method
    protected Object readResolve()
    {
        return instance;
    }
}
 
public class GFG 
{
 
    public static void main(String[] args) 
    {
        try
        {
            Singleton instance1 = Singleton.instance;
            ObjectOutput out 
                = new ObjectOutputStream(new FileOutputStream("file.text"));
            out.writeObject(instance1);
            out.close();
         
            // deserailize from file to object
            ObjectInput in 
                = new ObjectInputStream(new FileInputStream("file.text"));
            Singleton instance2 = (Singleton) in.readObject();
            in.close();
         
            System.out.println("instance1 hashCode:- "
                                           + instance1.hashCode());
            System.out.println("instance2 hashCode:- "
                                           + instance2.hashCode());
        } 
         
        catch (Exception e)
        {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }
}

Output

instance1 hashCode:- 1550089733
instance2 hashCode:- 1550089733

Refer https://codethataint.com/blog/singleton-and-serialization/

// JAVA code to explain cloning 
// issue with singleton
class SuperClass implements Cloneable
{
  int i = 10;
 
  @Override
  protected Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException 
  {
    return super.clone();
  }
}
 
// Singleton class
class Singleton extends SuperClass
{
  // public instance initialized when loading the class
  public static Singleton instance = new Singleton();
 
  private Singleton() 
  {
    // private constructor
  }
}
 
public class GFG
{
  public static void main(String[] args) throws CloneNotSupportedException 
  {
    Singleton instance1 = Singleton.instance;
    Singleton instance2 = (Singleton) instance1.clone();
    System.out.println("instance1 hashCode:- "
                           + instance1.hashCode());
    System.out.println("instance2 hashCode:- "
                           + instance2.hashCode()); 
  }
}

Output

Output :- 
instance1 hashCode:- 366712642
instance2 hashCode:- 1829164700

Two different hashCode means there are 2 different objects of singleton class.

To overcome this issue, override clone() method and throw an exception from clone method that is CloneNotSupportedException. Now whenever user will try to create clone of singleton object, it will throw exception and hence our class remains singleton.

// JAVA code to explain overcome 
// cloning issue with singleton
class SuperClass implements Cloneable
{
  int i = 10;
 
  @Override
  protected Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException 
  {
    return super.clone();
  }
}
 
// Singleton class
class Singleton extends SuperClass
{
  // public instance initialized when loading the class
  public static Singleton instance = new Singleton();
 
  private Singleton() 
  {
    // private constructor
  }
 
  @Override
  protected Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException 
  {
    throw new CloneNotSupportedException();
  }
}
 
public class GFG
{
  public static void main(String[] args) throws CloneNotSupportedException 
  {
    Singleton instance1 = Singleton.instance;
    Singleton instance2 = (Singleton) instance1.clone();
    System.out.println("instance1 hashCode:- "
                         + instance1.hashCode());
    System.out.println("instance2 hashCode:- "
                         + instance2.hashCode()); 
  }
}

Output

Output:-
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.CloneNotSupportedException
	at GFG.Singleton.clone(GFG.java:29)
	at GFG.GFG.main(GFG.java:38)

If you don;t want to throw exception you can also return the same instance from clone method.

// JAVA code to explain overcome 
// cloning issue with singleton
class SuperClass implements Cloneable
{
  int i = 10;
 
  @Override
  protected Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException 
  {
    return super.clone();
  }
}
 
// Singleton class
class Singleton extends SuperClass
{
  // public instance initialized when loading the class
  public static Singleton instance = new Singleton();
 
  private Singleton() 
  {
    // private constructor
  }
 
  @Override
  protected Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException 
  {
    return instance;
  }
}
 
public class GFG
{
  public static void main(String[] args) throws CloneNotSupportedException 
  {
    Singleton instance1 = Singleton.instance;
    Singleton instance2 = (Singleton) instance1.clone();
    System.out.println("instance1 hashCode:- "
                           + instance1.hashCode());
    System.out.println("instance2 hashCode:- "
                           + instance2.hashCode()); 
  }
}

Output

Output:-
instance1 hashCode:- 366712642
instance2 hashCode:- 366712642

The Best way to implement Singleton is by using ENUM which takes care of Serialization and Other Issues on its own.

Singleton.java

public class Singleton 
{ 
    private static Singleton instance;   
 
    private Singleton() {}

    public static Singleton getInstance() 
    {
       if (instance == null) {
          instance = new Singleton();
       }
       return instance;
    }
}

In a Multi-threaded Environment

  1. Two Threads, Thread A and Thread B tries to access Object of Singleton class
  2. Thread A and B does call to Static getInstance() method
  3. Now when Thread A tries to do Null Check of instance instance == null chances of Thread B also entered the if block exists
    .
    .
    .
    if (instance == null) 
    {
      //Two threads may have passed the condition and might have got in
      instance = new Singleton();
    }
    .
    .
    .
    
  4. Now both the Threads have their own instance for the Singleton class.
  5. So there would be 2 instances of Singleton class at the end of if Block

Now there are many work arounds but DoubleCheckedLocking, Enum Singleton and Initialization On Demand Holder are the Optimized approach

Refer Table in Link

Method 1
In this method we does static block initialization of Singleton along with synchronized getInstance() method which allows the access to only one thread at a point of time.
Singleton.java

public class Singleton 
{
    private static Singleton instance;
 
    private Singleton() {}

    public static synchronized Singleton getInstance() 
    {
       if (instance == null) {
          instance = new Singleton();
       }
       return instance;
    }
}

But the above method is expensive since there is unnecessary locking and unlocking done every time the object get accessed.

Method 2(Double Checked Locking Singleton)
Instead of synchronizing the whole method lets synchronize the block of code which allows single thread to access the instance during the first time access.The consecutive thread would be served with the same thread allocated for the First thread once it is done with its task.

Singleton.java

public class Singleton 
{
    private volatile static Singleton instance;

    private Singleton() {}

    public static Singleton getInstance() 
    {
      if (instance == null) {
          synchronized(Singleton.class) {
             if (instance == null) {
                instance = new Singleton();
             }
          }
       }
       return instance;
    }
}

Other ways of achieving singleton are by using Eager Initialization and ENUM which has its own advantages and disadvantages.

In which scenario we should serialize a singleton?
Imagine you have a long-running app and want to be able to shut it down and later continue at the point where it was shut down (e.g. in order to do hardware maintenance). If the app uses a singleton that is stateful, you’d have to be able to save and restore the sigleton’s state, which is most easily done by serializing it.

Is it possible to serialize a singleton object?
2 Methods

  1. By using ENUM : ENUM implements Serializable by Default
  2. By adding implements Serializable to class to make it serializable, and delaring all instance fields transient (to prevent a serialization attack) and provide a readResolve method.

readResolve() method in Singleton Class implementing Serialization

.
.
// readResolve method to preserve singleton property
private Object readResolve() {
     // Return the one true Elvis and let the garbage collector
     // take care of the Elvis impersonator.
    return INSTANCE;
}
.
.

Why you need readResolve() Method
This method will be invoked when you will de-serialize the object. Inside this method, you must return the existing instance to ensure single instance application wide.

The Way serialization works is as below

Serializes the Object Property -> Stores to Persistent Storage
From Persistent Storage -> Creates new Object and Sets Properties of Object

The Object Before Serialization and after Serialization are not same. Only the Object Properties are same

Now lets take a simple Example where we serializes the PrintReport Class which has priority as one of its Object Variable.priority tells which should be given first preference while printing

PrintReport.java

package com.mugil.org;

import java.io.Serializable;

public class PrintReport implements Serializable {
    private static PrintReport instance = null;
	 
    public static PrintReport getInstance() {
        if (instance == null) {
            instance = new PrintReport();
        }
        return instance;
    }
    
    private transient int priority = 2;

	public int getPriority() {
		return priority;
	}
	
	public void setPriority(int priority) {
		this.priority = priority;
	}
}

Now when the above singleton which implements serialization gets called as below

PrintMedicalReport.java

package com.mugil.org;

import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.FileOutputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.ObjectInput;
import java.io.ObjectInputStream;
import java.io.ObjectOutput;
import java.io.ObjectOutputStream;

public class PrintMedicalReport 
{	
	 static PrintReport instanceOne = PrintReport.getInstance();
	 
	    public static void main(String[] args) {
	        try {
	            // Serialize to a file
	            ObjectOutput out = new ObjectOutputStream(new FileOutputStream(
	                    "filename.ser"));
	            out.writeObject(instanceOne);
	            out.close();
	            
	            instanceOne.setPriority(1);
	            
	            // Serialize to a file
	            ObjectInput in = new ObjectInputStream(new FileInputStream(
	                    "filename.ser"));
	            PrintReport instanceTwo = (PrintReport) in.readObject();
	            in.close();
	 
	            System.out.println(instanceOne.getPriority());
	            System.out.println(instanceTwo.getPriority());
	 
	        } catch (IOException e) {
	            e.printStackTrace();
	        } catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
	            e.printStackTrace();
	        }
	    }
}

Output

1
2

Note in the above code the instanceOne.setPriority(2); should have been called before out.writeObject(instanceOne).But that is not the case since the example explains the Object are different before and after Serialization.Only Object Properties(Metadata) are stored during serialization not the actual object.

You can see the Class Prints default Priority value in the output.

Now in context to singleton we want to maintain exactly one Object exist before and after serialization. Not with two object with same set of attributes.To achieve this we add readResolve() Method.

PrintReport.java

package com.mugil.org;

import java.io.Serializable;

public class PrintReport implements Serializable {
	private volatile static PrintReport instance = null;
	 
    public static PrintReport getInstance() {
        if (instance == null) {
            instance = new PrintReport();
        }
        return instance;
    }
    
    private int priority = 1;

	public int getPriority() {
		return priority;
	}
	
	public void setPriority(int priority) {
		this.priority = priority;
	}    
	     
    protected Object readResolve() {
        return instance;
    }   
}

Now when the PrintMedicalReport class gets executed the Output would be as below

Output

1
1

When you Serialize and Deserialize new file would be created and stored in disk every time.

In the above image by changing the filename.ser text you can change the attribute of objects serialized. This is known as Serialization attack. To overcome this you must declare all instance fields as transient.

Reference 2

Lets Consider the below Singleton code which uses Double Checked Locking

DoubleCheckLocking.java

public class DoubleCheckLocking 
{
    public static class SearchBox 
    {
        private static volatile SearchBox searchBox;

        //Private constructor
        private SearchBox() {}

        //Static method to get instance
        public static SearchBox getInstance() {
            if (searchBox == null) { // first time lock
                synchronized (SearchBox.class) {
                    if (searchBox == null) {  // second time lock
                        searchBox = new SearchBox();
                    }
                }
            }
            return searchBox;
        }
}

Lets dive deep into the code where Double Checking actually takes place

  if (searchBox == null) { // first time lock
                synchronized (SearchBox.class) {
                    if (searchBox == null) {  // second time lock
                        searchBox = new SearchBox();
                    }
                }
            }
  1. Lets say we have two threads A and B and lets assume that atleast one of them reaches line 3 and observes searchBox == null is true.
  2. Two threads can not both be at line 3 at the same time because of the synchronized block. This is the key to understanding why double-checked locking works.
  3. So, it must the case that either A or B made it through synchronized first. Without loss of generality, say that that thread is A. Then, upon seeing searchBox == null is true, it will enter the body of the statement, and set searchBox to a new instance of SearchBox. It will then eventually exit the synchronized block.
  4. Now it will be B’s turn to enter: remember, B was blocked waiting for A to exit. Now when it enters the block, it will observe searchBox. But A will have left just having set searchBox to a non-null value.